On track or not, in plain words
Three sentences written from the numbers, then six headline figures, each with last period beside it.
Is hiring on track, and what should we do about it? The Hiring Review answers in one page: a verdict, six numbers next to last period, and the actions that matter. It is built from the work your team already does.
The submissions happened. The interviews happened. The calls happened. Then someone types it all again into a spreadsheet, and the CEO still asks “so, are we on track?”
What if counting was a side effect of working?
Weekly, monthly or quarterly, from the same definitions, so the weekly and the quarterly never disagree about a number.
Three sentences written from the numbers, then six headline figures, each with last period beside it.
The roles, applications and agencies that need someone, ranked.
Schedule it, and the digest lands in the inbox, made to be read there.
A company version for HR and the CEO, and an agency version for the agency owner.
When something needs a person, that person gets one task with a link to do it. Doing the work closes the task. Tick a task below: the weekly numbers count it, with nobody typing.
Nobody ticks boxes. The work does.
every task links to the work and closes itself
Each task names the person, role and stage. Urgent work, like a declined offer, is marked high.
Sample · each task closes itself when the work is done.
Every open role with its days open against the target you set, and the applications that have stalled for 14 days or more.
Task analysis shows pending work by type, age and overdue status, and which recruiter it sits with.
A board across all jobs, with the three things somebody has to chase today. Every number opens the rows behind it.
Funnel, source quality, recruiter productivity and agency spend. Share a report by link instead of exporting a spreadsheet. Alerts arrive live, and screens refresh on their own.
Stages, scorecards, approval chains and email templates are changed by your admin.
Let it count itself.